Sunday, October 21, 2012

Play-Doh Politics

For those who seek to bring the Kingdom to Earth,

I need to premise this with two statements.

1. I am so broken. If you know me at all, you know that I have always talked so much about not being a liberal or conservative, and instead being a follower of Jesus that aligns his political views based on Jesus’ teachings, but there are so many lies within my own words. My heart is weak and it has been so corrupted by the political discourse that plagues our society. I am prideful, arrogant, individualistic, and spiritually frail. I am so deeply broken enough to the point that being right sounds better than trying to align my heart with Jesus. How messed up is that? I’ve missed the point. If this was an archery contest I probably would have accidently shot the judge that sits in the exact opposite direction from the target at least 5 times by now.

2. Now that you understand my heart a little better, please stop for a second and lay aside every bit of political agenda you may have when reading this (I guess that's impossible, but at least try). Set aside your hatred, set aside your fears and discomforts, all the biases you may have, and lovingly pray for both presidential candidates in an equal way - desiring for both of them to fully know the love and peace of Jesus. Pray out of love for both of them equally. Please, right now, close your eyes, breathe, and pray.

Sweet. I’m going to ask you to that a few times because I know how heated we can get about these things.

Now. Onto the good stuff:

We live in a polarized society. Within this political context we are divided between the Republicans and Democrats, liberals and conservatives, socialists and capitalists, advocates for big government and small government. Within the context of faith, the entire church has been disconnected. A culture of disunity pervades the relationship between the evangelicals and social justice activists, fundamentalists and progressives, individualists and collectivists, and so on and so forth. And because we have interwoven American electoral politics with our faith, the gap between the two sides is only perpetuated. Because our religious identities have become lost in our fundamentally flawed political identities, our church has become divided and our vision for the Kingdom of God is corrupted. I am writing this because I was recently bashed in head by my own pride within the political discourse of America, and because I’m finally starting to somewhat scratch the surface, starting to understand what it means to combine the love of Jesus with the chaos of American politics and I’m finally starting to really discover that there is another choice in this polarized world, a choice that can’t be contained by the oppressive box of American political ideology and the polarizing vernacular that comes with it. There is something deeper to this discussion, and it starts at a fundamental level - with our own personal crap.

Honestly, I really dislike the discourse of American politics, especially within faith communities. Well, not in theory, just the form that the practice of this discussion has taken. From the within the church, to the academic world, to the chaotic realm of social media, I disdain political discussion between people of faith.  There is a depth that is missing in these discussions of policy and ideology. I seldom hear a person arguing politically out of a pure, unadulterated love for the people whom they are speaking to - whether for or against. Think about the discussions that you have had, the jokes you have made, the one-sided articles and Facebook statuses you have read, what is the heart behind these words? When Obama is speaking against Romney’s policies, no matter what they may be, I don’t hear words that are spoken from a heart that seeks to love and serve broken people and broken situations. I don’t hear a humble heart that wants the best for Romney and for those who support him. And the same goes with Romney when he speaks against Obama. And same holds true with the supporters of either candidate. In snide facebook remarks against either party, I don’t hear open minds and open hearts that desire to love the widows and the orphans of our time. I don’t hear broken, humble hearts that understand the depth of God’s love for His people and His desire for them to know the hope that the Kingdom can bring. That’s the point, right? For people of faith, that’s the only point of this entire political discussion - to make God’s love known and to make manifest that love through public policy.

This has hit me hard in the last week, because I know that I too get so easily entangled in my own pride and corrupted biases. Every time a Romney supporter makes a comment on Facebook that bashes Obama and his supporters or lifts Romney up to be the savior of America I get so frustrated and annoyed. I scoff at their arrogance and blame them for any degrading stereotypes that other nations have about America, but every time an Obama supporter makes fun of Romney I laugh obnoxiously and fully support it. In every discussion I have with a Romney supporter I immediately jump to the side against him not out of love for the individual, Romney, and the people of America, but out of pride, and because for whatever reason, I aligned my heart with the liberal agenda years ago and it is now unfortunately the lens that I look through. The political glasses that I wear have been made by liberals and they only blind me from my own pride. They shove love to the peripheral and install my pride, masquerading liberalism, at the center. Conservative glasses are not different. Any glasses that are not intricately and specifically constructed by Jesus and that are not made for the purpose of seeing His Kingdom transcend all Earthly things need to be snapped in half and thrown in the trash.

I’m going to use the example of the never ending debate between big government and small government. First off, stop again. Breathe for a second. Pray. And meditate on the heart of Jesus for a couple minutes... Now, do you really think Jesus cares how big or how small our government is? Did His rhetoric ever include how big or how small our government ought to be? Or is this all just another lens? On Palm Sunday the Jews thought him to be the one that would release them from Roman captivity, but instead, he wept for them, because they didn’t get it. Because that’s not how they could know peace. Peace is not dependent on how big or how small our government is. A smaller government will mean larger corporations that control the so called “free market,” which means more power for a fundamentally broken system, a bigger government means more power in another fundamentally broken system. Both systems are so broken, and so I truly, genuinely, with all my heart believe that if our faith is so heavily weighed upon either of these two choices, then we entirely miss the point - which is to make sure that people know the love of God and the beauty is a relationship with him. The point is to bring His Kingdom to Earth.

Answer me this, when you talk about getting our country out of 16 trillion in debt, what are your main priorities? When you speak for or against homosexual marriage, abortion, big/small government, military budgets, etc is your primary focus to ensure that people experience and know the profound, crazy stinkin’ awesome love of Jesus, or is it based on your personal culture that has been shaped by your upbringing, surroundings, and past/current relationships. Is it based on a desire to see His Kingdom on Earth, or is it based on a discomfort for specific terminology such as “hand outs,” socialism, capitalism, big corporations, freedom, military, Iraq, global warming, etc? Just stop for a second and search through the past to see if your opinions have in any way, shape, or form been talked about out of pride, arrogance, your internal/external culture, personal discomforts, or anything else that is not intrinsically woven by Jesus. Because as faith-oriented as my arguments can sound sometimes, I sure as hell know that well over half of the political words that come out of my mouth are made because I have very little understanding of humility.  

Here’s my incredibly cheesy analogy: I have this image of one of those cool plastic playdo (the gooshy cool stuff) shapes that you can put plato into so that it will mold into a specific shape, like a jedi warrior or something rad like that. In this analogy our experiences, culture, influences, etc manufacture the plastic shape which is our political idendity, and the world hands us a bunch awesome, new playdo which are the issues of the world that are being discussed. I think that for most of us, prior to/during college, our political identities are manufactured into a little plastic elephant or donkey. Our opinions on policy is the playdo animal that comes out after being pressed into the shape. We talk a lot about a lesser of two evils, but bottom line is that we don’t really care which is one less evil. How can a playdo donkey or elephant be evil? We just want our playdo to look more like an elephant or donkey. Sure, because we’re children we have the capability to use dainty scissors to cut away certain angles and edges to make it look a little more like we want it to, but ultimately it’s still an elephant or a donkey. I truly believe that Jesus wants to melt our little immature plastic toys that are our political identities and manufacture something entirely more awesome... like a jedi... but better. He wants to make something entirely new, more beautiful, more conducive to His love, and more constructive for His Kingdom.




As people of faith it is imperative that we start looking inward on our own personal stuff going on in our hearts (you know, the kind of stuff that we hate facing) before we start swan diving into these political discussions, because all the junk inside of us not only corrupts our political opinions, but also our hearts which only leads to the corruption and disunity of our Church. I yearn to see the church united as one body of Christ that prayerfully, creatively, intelligently, passionately, whimsically (to totally steal a good Bob Goff term), and whole heartedly pursues the Kingdom of God in our own communities, our country, and the world at large. Oh man oh man oh man if the sound of that doesn’t get your blood boiling in a good way I don’t know what will! I know I’m a total idealist, but wouldn’t that be so stinkin’ beautiful!

Anyways, There is something way different to choose from in this political debate, and it has way less to do with who controls our government than we think, because in the wise words of my dear friend, Ryan Hamill, Jesus has total control over it anyways. How awesome is that?

Please, if you have any questions, comments, additions, problems, or if you just want a good conversation about anything I just talked about, or about anything at all really, feel free to call me

704-280-9840. I would love to hear your perspectives.

Grace and Peace,

Phillip



Thursday, March 8, 2012

Another Contribution to the KONY 2012 Discussion.

Before I make the giant leap into the mass Invisible Children discourse, I have to provide a disclaimer to assure that my words are not interpreted out of the context of what I believe: I am NOT on either side. I am NOT anti-Invisible Children, nor am I an advocate for many of their campaigns. The volunteers, staff, and supporters of Invisible Children with whom I have interacted are some of the most passionate, caring, and strong-willed individuals I have had the pleasure of meeting. In many respects, Invisible Children has had a profoundly positive effect on the development of Northern Uganda for the last ten years. But over the last few years I have noticed that something is off. There seems to be this strictly linear equation implemented into the ideology of Invisible Children and their followers: social media + trendiness = “change the world” (which is currently probably the trendiest statement in existence). This equation can also be reversed: change the world + social media = trendiness. These equations have drawn a very vague line between those who yearn to see legitimate, sustainable change, and those who want thousands of friends to like their status.

Because Invisible Children has drawn this line so faintly, it’s impeccably easy to find yourself on the trendy side. That’s exactly where I was. And often times I still find myself there. I want to be a part of a movement. I want to be admired for fighting off the oppressors and appreciated for bringing justice to the world. And it wasn’t until I was asked very specific questions about myself and social justice that this line was even revealed. But I learned that it is crucial to recognize that this way of thinking makes these movements more about me than anyone else. KONY 2012 is often just tagline for individualized self-promotion. I know this because I used THE RESCUE for the same purpose three years ago. But if we are going to see a dramatic shift in the direction of Uganda, then we cannot afford to overlook our own social and emotional biases from the issue itself. We have connected them, and we must recognize the connection and figure out our own crap before we can enter into the realm of Ugandan social justice because it goes much deeper than Kony.

QUESTIONS

Both myself and my family has spent a significant amount of time living in Uganda, and in our time there we learned very quickly that in order to find ourselves ever promoting any kind of sustainable change within the communities, we have to ask questions first. A lot of questions. And the troubling aspect of this KONY 2012 movement is that the overwhelmingly controlling question of the campaign is “How do we get rid of Kony?” And people are blindly following this thought without any question. I fully agree that Kony is an awful man who has done awful awful things, but if you ever want to see legitimate change in Uganda, a lot more questions are to be asked, such as…

1. - Who is the President of Uganda? What is he like?

2. - Why does he support Invisible Children?

3. - Why did Joseph Kony start a rebel army 26 years ago?

4. - Why do you support Invisible Children? (Think of something different aside from “I want to change the world” and “saving African children.”)

5. - What happens after Kony is dead?

WE ALL WANT JUSTICE. We all want Uganda to see drastic change. But in order for this to happen we must start asking different questions. We must look at the root of the issues, because the fact of the matter is that as long as there is a President like Yoweri Musevini in office, there will always be men like Joseph Kony trying to overthrow them. Although I love the hearts and intentions of IC, I think they have a very surface level approach to issues of justice and consequently ignore and even SUPPORT more fundamental issues that pervade the entire country of Uganda with corruption and injustice.

Did you know that Musevini has had thousands of peaceful protestors tier gassed, and brutally beaten for walking to work instead of driving in protest rising gas prices? Did you know that Musevini has had many opposing party leaders beaten and imprisoned under false claims? Did you know that when the UK gave 70 million euros of financial aid to the country, Musevini spent 30 MILLION OF IT on a private jet while the entire country is facing devastating economic poverty? Did you know that during election season he openly bribes millions of citizens for their votes with a bag of rice? Did you know that the people are scared to speak about him in public because they are afraid of being killed? Did you know that Uganda’s military, the force which Invisible Children openly supports, has been countlessly accused of acts of rape and looting? (Oyston, Grant). Did you know that Kony’s intentions have always been to overthrow the Ugandan government? Like I said, Kony is an awful awful man who has done awful awful things that God can only forgive, but his Hitler-like celebrity status has indirectly awarded Musevini with a badge of honor and a pat on the back for putting up strong fight against Kony, and consequently, his actions are ignored. Unfortunately, culture and politics are the roots of this pervasive issue and if we view the country with strict, narrowly focused tunnel vision fixed upon Kony, then Uganda will never see the peace that they hope for.

Injustice is an infection that has spread throughout Uganda without any intention of healing itself. But the healing that is necessary will not come from killing Kony, nor will it come from you or me. We are only trendy bandaids put over an amputated leg. The true healing will come from the people of Uganda. Healing will come when we humbly accept our role as servants not saviors. We have yet to explore the possibility that the people of Uganda are fully capable of bringing justice to their country in the ways that they see fit. Our only purpose is to come alongside them, listen to them, and support them in their process of leading their country out of their brokenness.